Police arrested Leamington man and held him in custody by mistake

A judge at Warwick Crown Court granted a Leamington man bail so he could visit his sick partner in hospital, only for him to be arrested and held in custody for breaching a curfew.
Court news. NNL-170524-154443005Court news. NNL-170524-154443005
Court news. NNL-170524-154443005

And Alistair Tallis was held in custody for two days before the court heard his arrest had been a mistake by the police – because he was no longer subject to the curfew.

Tallis, 24, of Gloucester Street, Leamington, had been committed to the crown court to be sentenced after pleading guilty to breaching a suspended sentence and two offences of theft.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Judge Sylvia de Bertodano initially bailed him to enable him to visit his girlfriend who was ill and in hospital.

Although he had been made subject to a curfew as part of a 12-month suspended sentence imposed in November last year for dangerous driving, it had only been for three months.

But after being bailed, in the early hours of the following morning, the police were called to an incident where they saw Tallis.

Although it did not lead to any charges, they arrested him because a PNC check mistakenly showed there was a curfew as a condition of his bail, explained prosecutor Jennifer Josephs.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Of the actual offences he faced, she said he had missed three supervision appointments with the probation service, and when he had attended, he ‘has not engaged very well,’ becoming angry and using inappropriate language.

He had also committed two further offences of theft, stealing perfume and other items worth £26 from Morrisons, and goods worth £85 from the Boots store in Leamington.

Miss Josephs pointed out that there was a recommendation from the Probation Service that Tallis be fined for his breach of the suspended sentence.

But Judge de Bertodano commented: “This is a man who’s been shoplifting because he hasn’t got any money. How is a fine going to help?”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Andrew Tucker, defending, submitted: “There is still something that can be done with him, rather than sending him to custody. He is somebody I would invite you to give one final chance to.”

The judge responded: “What is he going to do to make this work? If I give him a chance, and in a week he has no money and goes into a shop shoplifting, that’s not doing him any favours.

“Why don’t I give him an opportunity to re-engage?”

Judge de Bertodano said she would adjourn the case until September to give Tallis a chance to comply with the order and to work with the Recovery Partnership to tackle his drug problem.

“Provided he has a positive report from probation saying he is properly engaging, and provided there are no further offences, when he comes back before me I will not activate the sentence.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She told Tallis: “I am going to give you an opportunity to get things straight in your life. You can either work with probation, or it’s going to be prison.”

And she added: “I am sorry about the mix-up. It was my intention that you should have been able to visit your girlfriend in hospital.”