Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 5th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Littleton Close fence looks set to come down



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 October 2007
A Kenilworth man could be forced to pull down a fence at his Littleton Close home if a further appeal is rejected.
Matthew Fleming is appealing against Warwick District Council's decision to refuse retrospective planning permission of a fence outside his home.

Mr Fleming, who has lived at the property since September 2006, put up the fence as, he says, he did
not realise planning permission was needed.

Neighbours contacted the district council to inform them of what Mr Fleming had done and officers visited his home to notify him that he would need to seek permission.

Sandip Sahota, senior planning officer at Warwick District Council, said: "He submitted retrospective planning permission but that was refused. He then appealed but it was refused again. He appealed again and it was dismissed and enforcement was put in place on Friday to make sure he takes the fence down within two months.

"He has now appealed again but it is unlikely that it will go through. It is almost definite that it will be refused and he will have until December 12 to take it down."

Consultation letters were sent out to neighbours who objected to the plans.

The District Planning Authority refused to give permission, saying the fencing has a 'detrimental impact' on the local area.

Mr Sahota added: "When the development was built we took all rights away to put fences up due to the open plan layout of the area."

Mr Fleming was not available for comment but in a letter to Warwick District Council he apologised to the council and residents of the close if any offence had been caused.

He said he had lived in Birmingham all his life and having owned numerous properties in that area had erected several fences and it would not have occurred to him that he would need to seek permission for the same.



The full article contains 320 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 October 2007 2:49 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Kenilworth
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Matthew Fleming,

LIttleton Close 23/10/2007 14:10:24
I am the Matthew Fleming referred to in your article of the 18th October concerning the erection of a fence on Littleton Close. I have to say that I have not been asked by your publication to make comment on the recent planning application so it is somewhat misleading to say I am "unavailable for comment"! This has been a somewhat complex matter - not assisted by the necessity to consider legal action against one of my neighbours for libellous comments made again me - comments that were subsequently withdrawn under the threat of action against him. Whilst the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol has admitted that the decision not to allow the appeal is a blatant breach of my human rights that doesn't seem to matter! The annoying part of this whole episode is that prior to clearing the site I have fenced the area was covered by numerous bushes, brambles and trees that not only made this part of my garden particularly untidy but which exceeded the height of the fencing I have erected by several metres! It's a sad day when you are unable to make your own garden a secure and pleasant area for your family to enjoy. To say that Littleton Close is now an "open plan layout" is simply ridiculous as since the construction of the houses in this development some 12 years ago there has been substantial growth of bushes and trees along the Close that are now three to four metres in height - making it far from open plan. Unfortunately I beleive that the real issue - and the reason behind neighbourhood objections - was that once the land was cleared it became very evident that it was a large area that substantially added to my plot. I am currently considering an application to the Administrative Court in London as in the course of the enforcement notice not only did the Local Authority fail to mention a large section of the fence in their Statement of Case but further misled the Inspectorate as to the height of the fencing they did mention!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.